Article: DPDP Compliance
What happens when a customer asks your company to delete their personal information? Can you simply remove their account, or must you track down every copy of their data across emails, databases, servers and third-party platforms?
Imagine a customer who has closed their account with your company. They send a formal request asking you to delete their personal information.
Your customer support team marks the account as closed. The CRM record is removed. The request appears resolved.
But what about their contact details stored in email archives? Their payment records in financial systems? Their information backed up on company servers? Or the personal data shared with an external service provider?
This is precisely the kind of challenge that India's Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 seeks to address.
The DPDP Act recognises an individual's right to request the erasure of their personal data under Section 12.
Under this provision, a Data Principal can request the deletion of personal data for which they have previously provided consent, including consent under certain legitimate uses specified in the Act.
Upon receiving an erasure request, the Data Fiduciary must erase the relevant personal data unless retaining it is necessary:
In simple terms, companies cannot continue retaining personal information without a valid reason. However, they must also respect legal record-retention obligations.
This makes the right to erasure more than an account-deletion feature. It requires organisations to understand where personal data is stored, why it is retained and when it can be safely removed.
A data deletion request should trigger an organised process within the company, not just a support-ticket closure. Here are five important stages businesses should consider.
Before deleting any personal information, the organisation must establish that the request comes from the relevant Data Principal or an authorised representative.
Without proper verification, someone could potentially request the deletion of another person's information.
Companies should have a documented process for identifying the requester using appropriate account identifiers or verification methods without collecting unnecessary additional personal information.
This is where many organisations face their biggest challenge. Personal data and personally identifiable information (PII) may be scattered across multiple systems, including:
A company cannot make an informed deletion decision if it does not know where the information exists. Without proper data discovery and mapping, even a genuine deletion request can leave personal information unaccounted for.
Not every deletion request means every record must disappear immediately.
For example, a customer may request the deletion of their account, but the company may still need to retain certain transaction records to comply with applicable financial, tax or other legal requirements.
Section 12 recognises these legal retention exceptions. The organisation should therefore distinguish between:
Any retained information should not be treated as permission for unrestricted future use.
Deleting information from the main customer database is not necessarily enough.
If the company has shared personal data with a Data Processor, such as a cloud hosting provider or an external service platform, it must account for that processing relationship.
The Data Fiduciary should establish appropriate instructions, contractual controls and verification procedures to ensure that deletion obligations are properly addressed across relevant systems.
Organisations must also understand how their backup and archival environments handle deletion, including when information can be permanently erased under applicable retention requirements.
A deletion request should have a clear audit trail. Companies should maintain appropriate records of:
This documentation helps demonstrate accountability and makes future compliance reviews more reliable.
Yes, but only where the applicable legal conditions are met.
Section 8(7) also requires a Data Fiduciary to erase personal data when the Data Principal withdraws consent or when it is reasonable to assume that the specified purpose is no longer being served, unless retention is necessary for compliance with law.
The DPDP Rules, 2025 provide additional clarity on certain retention and erasure requirements. For specified classes of Data Fiduciaries and purposes, Rule 8 provides defined periods after which personal data must be erased if the individual has not interacted with the organisation or exercised their rights. It also provides for advance notification at least 48 hours before such scheduled erasure.
Separately, Rule 8(3) requires certain personal data and associated processing logs to be retained for at least one year for specified security purposes, subject to applicable legal requirements.
The key takeaway: Data retention must be justified, documented and controlled. Keeping everything indefinitely is not a responsible data protection strategy.
A company may have a privacy policy explaining its commitment to data protection. But can its IT infrastructure actually support a customer's deletion request?
Consider these important questions:
If the answer to these questions is unclear, your organisation may have significant data governance and compliance gaps. Don't wait until a customer asks for their data to be deleted to discover where it is stored.
Build data visibility. Strengthen your security controls. Prepare your organisation for DPDP compliance.